Cursor vs JetBrains: Market Share & Adoption Data (August 2026)

Cursor logoCursor#5 by adoption#7 by spend
JetBrains logoJetBrains#17 by adoption#14 by spend

Cursor holds 3.19% of SaaS market share by adoption (#5 overall); JetBrains holds 0.79% (#17), and has held its rank over the last 12 months.

Cursor vs JetBrains market share over time

Monthly market share by adoption and by spend, full history. Share is each product's percentage of all SaaS purchasing activity tracked in the dataset that month.

MonthCursor adoption shareJetBrains adoption shareCursor spend shareJetBrains spend share
Sep-20230.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Oct-20230.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Nov-20230.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Dec-20230.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Jan-20240.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Feb-20240.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Mar-20240.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Apr-20240.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
May-20240.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Jun-20240.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Jul-20240.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Aug-20240.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%
Sep-20240.07%0.00%0.01%0.00%
Oct-20240.10%0.00%0.01%0.00%
Nov-20240.14%0.01%0.02%0.00%
Dec-20240.19%0.01%0.04%0.00%
Jan-20250.28%0.00%0.05%0.00%
Feb-20250.39%0.01%0.08%0.00%
Mar-20250.58%0.00%0.14%0.00%
Apr-20250.76%0.00%0.19%0.00%
May-20250.96%0.00%0.25%0.00%
Jun-20251.19%0.00%0.32%0.00%
Jul-20251.40%0.00%0.40%0.00%
Aug-20251.62%0.00%0.49%0.00%
Sep-20251.81%0.00%0.59%0.00%
Oct-20252.00%0.00%0.69%0.00%
Nov-20252.21%0.00%0.81%0.00%
Dec-20252.39%0.00%0.93%0.00%
Jan-20262.58%0.00%1.09%0.00%
Feb-20262.77%0.00%1.22%0.00%
Mar-20262.88%0.00%1.39%0.00%
Apr-20262.99%0.00%1.55%0.00%
May-20263.07%0.00%1.71%0.00%
Jun-20263.09%0.00%1.83%0.00%
Jul-20263.12%0.00%1.96%0.00%
Aug-20263.19%0.00%2.06%0.00%
Aug-20220.03%0.00%
Sep-20220.00%0.00%
Oct-20220.03%0.00%
Nov-20220.00%0.00%
Dec-20220.00%0.00%
Jan-20230.00%0.00%
Feb-20230.00%0.00%
Mar-20230.01%0.00%
Apr-20230.01%0.00%
May-20230.01%0.00%
Jun-20230.01%0.00%
Jul-20230.01%0.00%
Aug-20230.01%0.00%

Spend rank vs adoption rank

ProductRank by adoptionRank by spendAdoption shareSpend share12-mo rank change
Cursor#5#73.19%2.06%
JetBrains#17#140.79%1.03%

Cursor ranks higher by adoption (#5) than by spend (#7) — it is widely adopted at a comparatively low price point.

JetBrains ranks higher by spend (#14) than by adoption (#17) — customers pay more per company than its adoption rank suggests.

Do companies use Cursor and JetBrains together?

50.1% of companies paying for Cursor also pay for JetBrains.

38.7% of companies paying for JetBrains also pay for Cursor.

Overlap is measured on companies with active paid subscriptions to both products — a high overlap means the two tools are often complements rather than strict substitutes.

What companies adopt after leaving JetBrains

Among companies whose JetBrains subscription lapsed in the last 90 days, these are the most-adopted tools in the same workflow, as a share of switchers:

  1. GitHub — adopted by 121.9% of switchers
  2. Amazon Web Services — adopted by 90.6% of switchers
  3. Google Cloud — adopted by 78.1% of switchers

Which stack does each tool live in?

Tools most often found alongside Cursor

ToolCategoryOverlap with companies paying for Cursor
OpenAIAI Platforms & Model Ops91.6%
AnthropicAI Platforms & Model Ops88.9%
GitHubEngineering & DevOps82.8%
FigmaMarketing & Growth81.8%
AdobeMarketing & Growth76.5%

Tools most often found alongside JetBrains

ToolCategoryOverlap with companies paying for JetBrains
OpenAIAI Platforms & Model Ops79.3%
GitHubEngineering & DevOps78.9%
FigmaMarketing & Growth78.3%
AdobeMarketing & Growth75.4%
MicrosoftCollaboration & Productivity72.1%

Analyst take: what the data says about Cursor vs JetBrains

Cursor has the clearer adoption lead as of August 2026, ranking #5 overall compared with JetBrains at #17. Their adoption ranks have moved at the same pace over the past year. By spend, Cursor ranks higher (#7 versus #14), which shows where more of the measured software budget currently sits. The switching signal adds useful context: after leaving JetBrains, some companies adopted GitHub or Amazon Web Services. The practical takeaway is to separate market position from product fit: the rankings show which tool is more established and where buying momentum is moving, but they do not measure features, price, or quality. Use those signals to build a shortlist, then decide against your own workflows and requirements.

Cursor and JetBrains at a glance

Cursor: Cursor is an AI code editor powered by OpenAI's GPT models that allows users to write, edit, and discuss code within the editor.

JetBrains: JetBrains provides a suite of developer tools, including Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like IntelliJ IDEA for Java and PyCharm for Python, as well as team collaboration and continuous integration solutions.

ProductCategorySubcategoryPrimary teamAI classification
CursorEngineering & DevOpsDev ToolsEngineeringAI-Native
JetBrainsEngineering & DevOpsDeveloper Tools & IDEsEngineeringAI-Embedded

Cursor vs JetBrains: frequently asked questions

Which is more popular, Cursor or JetBrains?

Cursor is more widely adopted in this data as of August 2026. It ranks #5 overall, while JetBrains ranks #17. This measures observed software adoption, not product quality or suitability for a particular company.

Which is growing faster, Cursor or JetBrains?

Cursor has held its rank over the last 12 months, while JetBrains held its rank. This is a change in relative adoption rank; it does not prove that companies are leaving one product for the other.

Can you use Cursor and JetBrains together?

Yes. In the measured data, 50.1% of companies paying for Cursor also pay for JetBrains, and 38.7% of companies paying for JetBrains also pay for Cursor. That shows the products can coexist, although the data does not explain why a company uses both or whether they serve the same workflow.

Which is bigger by spend, Cursor or JetBrains?

Cursor ranks higher by measured spend. Cursor is #7 and JetBrains is #14. Spend rank shows where more of the observed software budget sits; it does not explain pricing or value.

Is Cursor better than JetBrains for ide/dev tools use cases?

This data cannot determine which product is better. It measures adoption, spend position, momentum, and—in some cases—overlap. Use those signals to understand market position, then compare the products against your own workflows, requirements, and budget.