Cursor vs Replit: Market Share & Adoption Data (August 2026)

Cursor logoCursor#5 by adoption#7 by spend
Replit logoReplit#60 by adoption#172 by spend

Cursor holds 3.19% of SaaS market share by adoption (#5 overall); Replit holds 0.25% (#60), and has held its rank over the last 12 months.

Cursor vs Replit market share over time

Monthly market share by adoption and by spend, full history. Share is each product's percentage of all SaaS purchasing activity tracked in the dataset that month.

MonthCursor adoption shareReplit adoption shareCursor spend shareReplit spend share
Sep-20230.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%
Oct-20230.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%
Nov-20230.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%
Dec-20230.01%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Jan-20240.01%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Feb-20240.01%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Mar-20240.02%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Apr-20240.03%0.03%0.00%0.01%
May-20240.03%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Jun-20240.03%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Jul-20240.04%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Aug-20240.05%0.03%0.00%0.01%
Sep-20240.07%0.04%0.01%0.01%
Oct-20240.10%0.04%0.01%0.01%
Nov-20240.14%0.04%0.02%0.01%
Dec-20240.19%0.04%0.04%0.01%
Jan-20250.28%0.05%0.05%0.01%
Feb-20250.39%0.05%0.08%0.01%
Mar-20250.58%0.05%0.14%0.01%
Apr-20250.76%0.06%0.19%0.01%
May-20250.96%0.07%0.25%0.01%
Jun-20251.19%0.08%0.32%0.01%
Jul-20251.40%0.09%0.40%0.01%
Aug-20251.62%0.10%0.49%0.02%
Sep-20251.81%0.12%0.59%0.02%
Oct-20252.00%0.13%0.69%0.02%
Nov-20252.21%0.15%0.81%0.02%
Dec-20252.39%0.16%0.93%0.03%
Jan-20262.58%0.17%1.09%0.03%
Feb-20262.77%0.20%1.22%0.04%
Mar-20262.88%0.21%1.39%0.05%
Apr-20262.99%0.23%1.55%0.05%
May-20263.07%0.23%1.71%0.06%
Jun-20263.09%0.24%1.83%0.07%
Jul-20263.12%0.24%1.96%0.07%
Aug-20263.19%0.25%2.06%0.08%
Aug-2022—0.03%—0.00%
Sep-2022—0.03%—0.00%
Oct-2022—0.03%—0.00%
Nov-2022—0.03%—0.00%
Dec-2022—0.02%—0.00%
Jan-2023—0.02%—0.00%
Feb-2023—0.02%—0.00%
Mar-2023—0.02%—0.00%
Apr-2023—0.02%—0.00%
May-2023—0.02%—0.00%
Jun-2023—0.02%—0.00%
Jul-2023—0.02%—0.00%
Aug-2023—0.02%—0.00%

Spend rank vs adoption rank

ProductRank by adoptionRank by spendAdoption shareSpend share12-mo rank change
Cursor#5#73.19%2.06%—
Replit#60#1720.25%0.08%—

Cursor ranks higher by adoption (#5) than by spend (#7) — it is widely adopted at a comparatively low price point.

Replit ranks higher by adoption (#60) than by spend (#172) — it is widely adopted at a comparatively low price point.

Do companies use Cursor and Replit together?

64.4% of companies paying for Replit also pay for Cursor.

Overlap is measured on companies with active paid subscriptions to both products — a high overlap means the two tools are often complements rather than strict substitutes.

What companies adopt after leaving Replit

Among companies whose Replit subscription lapsed in the last 90 days, these are the most-adopted tools in the same workflow, as a share of switchers:

  1. Anthropic — adopted by 77.8% of switchers
  2. OpenAI — adopted by 66.7% of switchers
  3. GitHub — adopted by 66.7% of switchers

Which stack does each tool live in?

Tools most often found alongside Cursor

ToolCategoryOverlap with companies paying for Cursor
OpenAIAI Platforms & Model Ops91.6%
AnthropicAI Platforms & Model Ops88.9%
GitHubEngineering & DevOps82.8%
FigmaMarketing & Growth81.8%
AdobeMarketing & Growth76.5%

Tools most often found alongside Replit

ToolCategoryOverlap with companies paying for Replit
OpenAIAI Platforms & Model Ops98.6%
AnthropicAI Platforms & Model Ops90.4%
GitHubEngineering & DevOps84.9%
MicrosoftCollaboration & Productivity84.9%
AdobeMarketing & Growth82.2%

Analyst take: what the data says about Cursor vs Replit

Cursor has the clearer adoption lead as of August 2026, ranking #5 overall compared with Replit at #60. Their adoption ranks have moved at the same pace over the past year. By spend, Cursor ranks higher (#7 versus #172), which shows where more of the measured software budget currently sits. The switching signal adds useful context: after leaving Replit, some companies adopted Anthropic or OpenAI. The practical takeaway is to separate market position from product fit: the rankings show which tool is more established and where buying momentum is moving, but they do not measure features, price, or quality. Use those signals to build a shortlist, then decide against your own workflows and requirements.

Cursor and Replit at a glance

Cursor: Cursor is an AI code editor powered by OpenAI's GPT models that allows users to write, edit, and discuss code within the editor.

Replit: Replit is a software creation platform that facilitates collaborative building with AI integration. It offers an instant-start environment for development across various languages and frameworks, with built-in live collaboration tools. The platform also features capabilities for one-click debugging,

ProductCategorySubcategoryPrimary teamAI classification
CursorEngineering & DevOpsDev ToolsEngineeringAI-Native
ReplitEngineering & DevOpsDev ToolsEngineeringAI-Native

Cursor vs Replit: frequently asked questions

Which is more popular, Cursor or Replit?

Cursor is more widely adopted in this data as of August 2026. It ranks #5 overall, while Replit ranks #60. This measures observed software adoption, not product quality or suitability for a particular company.

Which is growing faster, Cursor or Replit?

Cursor has held its rank over the last 12 months, while Replit held its rank. This is a change in relative adoption rank; it does not prove that companies are leaving one product for the other.

Can you use Cursor and Replit together?

Yes. In the measured data, 64.4% of companies paying for Replit also pay for Cursor. That shows the products can coexist, although the data does not explain why a company uses both or whether they serve the same workflow.

Which is bigger by spend, Cursor or Replit?

Cursor ranks higher by measured spend. Cursor is #7 and Replit is #172. Spend rank shows where more of the observed software budget sits; it does not explain pricing or value.

Is Cursor better than Replit for ai coding use cases?

This data cannot determine which product is better. It measures adoption, spend position, momentum, and—in some cases—overlap. Use those signals to understand market position, then compare the products against your own workflows, requirements, and budget.